Okay. Again, I emphasize that she is fully in her right to do that if she believes the minutes did not properly reflect her words. But the implication that somebody manipulated the minutes is false. Nobody has contacted the clerk to ask for an alteration of the minutes whatsoever—certainly not on this side. The only person who did was Ms. Chow, in order to correct what she saw was an error.
The discussion on the “Infrastructure Funding Study Proposal” does not actually come out of the verbatim in the minutes. It comes out of a document the NDP submitted to the chair, which was circulated. Is that correct?