You could have multiple breaches.
Again, it's the arbitrated service agreement, which will differ from shipper to shipper, that will lay out the framework for what service obligations the railway has to that shipper. There are details, such as that the service will be on a certain day, at a certain hour, and in there is how they will get along in the event the railway cannot provide service, if there's been an avalanche, or whatever. It will have the protocol for recovery of the service.
All of those things can be laid out in the service agreement. There will be parameters for determining whether the railway is respecting the agreement. For example, if you had a case where the service is supposed to be on a certain day and it's supposed to be a certain number of cars, then if both of those things did not happen, the agency would have the authority to determine whether that's one breach or two breaches.
That is within the purview of the agency to determine, based on what is in the specific agreement that a shipper is claiming has been breached. It does depend, case by case, but if there are multiple requirements, certainly the scope is there for the shipper to claim there have been multiple breaches and for the agency to apply multiple AMPs in a particular case.