Good. My kids and my, I hope, soon-to-be grandchildren would be happy to hear that.
I want to talk a little on the fine process. The $100,000 fine has been brought up a few times. There has been some indication from some of the other questions that this is seen more as a source of revenue for the government.
I would see it, and I wonder if you would agree or disagree, as really a desire to make sure that the railway is basically doubly motivated to make sure that they're meeting their obligations. They have one motivation. I think the commercial motivation is probably their number one motivation anyhow. Anybody who wants to run a business, I would assume, wants to run an appropriate business. They want to run a business that is well respected by all parties they deal with, and if you're going from that way of thinking, you also want to be well respected by your clients, or your shippers in this case.
Would you say this is basically meant more as a bit of doubling up of that motivation, not looking for a source of revenue? In fact, hopefully from the government's perspective, this is a fine we very rarely or never would collect.