I think what we should consider is the fact that while we haven't seen the form that it'll take, and we understand that regulations are being drafted and will be put in place later this year, it might have an impact on what you would consider to be chronic failures.
What's difficult to understand is that hundreds of shippers across this country every day have ordered equipment and received an allocation for that equipment that may or may not meet their order. They then wait for the equipment to show up on the day it was committed to show up—and it may not show up on that day, or the amount that they had ordered or were committed to be given does not show up. Then once they've loaded and released those cars, perhaps the transit times exceed what's been agreed upon as a reasonable range. When you consider all of those factors occurring for hundreds of shippers every day and the number of breaches that would occur within those contexts, it's difficult to understand how the application of AMPs would be the most cost effective and efficient process to follow. To have each one of those hundreds of shippers appeal to the agency to have an enforcement officer come and determine whether a breach has occurred on the spotting performance or on the allocation—