What I was trying to communicate in the remarks of mine that you just cited is that many of the people whom I had spoken to about this potential legislation were frankly outraged that the government would step into an area that was working in a commercial context. In particular, if you look at it historically—and that's why I tried to refer to some of the history today—over the last 30 years, successive governments have made good public policy to ensure that railways and their customers are operating in a commercial context. That's why railways can invest as much money as we have in our infrastructure. That's why we've created a short-line industry, which has been able to pick up these pieces. I said the reverse of.... Really, most people were outraged that the government wanted to introduce new legislation, including the railroad industry, which didn't really want this provision to be introduced.
