I can start, if you'd like.
I fully agree with your commentary. I tried in my opening remarks to give a sense of the importance of this. I think it's one of the biggest issues that we've had throughout this process and that continues to be there, given what we've seen of the proposals by some of the associations who want to see the bill amended to take that away from the process. I think that would be right at the top of the list of mistakes that you'd make, because of the reasons you've just outlined.
On our ability to function, we just talked about the kind of collaboration agreements we've done with ports and terminals and the kind of work we do with other supply chain partners. When you think about moving any particular commodity, our average haul is about 1,400 kilometres. Think about the number of touch points that you're going to have there: two out of three cross a border, so you're into ports, you're into terminals, you're into terminals inland. You could be transloading, you could be interchanging traffic. There are just so many pieces that move here in order to finish a movement. From our standpoint it's absolutely critical. So I agree with you.
Robert, I don't know if you have anything add.