Sure. I'm not trying to dominate, but I'm just trying to understand this dialogue here, because it always takes both parties to do a deal.
One might assume that because of the historic relationship that railways have and, if you will, a certain amount of extra influence over the process, do you think there's enough...? I say this in total good faith: is there sufficient protection for the railways in this balance back and forth? It's just so that we get that other perspective, because we've spoken at length about shippers and, of course, beyond the shippers are the people that actually have to produce the goods to be shipped.
We understand that we have an obligation and that the intent of this bill is to try to find that balance, but do you feel that there's sufficient here to protect the interests of the railways as well, as a result of this bill?