I am looking at Liberal-1 and NDP-1 for a moment, which form the basis of the first issue raised by the Coalition of Rail Shippers, effectively defining adequate and suitable accommodation and service obligations.
I take particular note in the way that it's done, “a railway shall be considered to have fulfilled the service obligations referred to...if it has carried them out in a manner that meets the rail transportation needs of the shipper”. Does this effectively vault the right of the shipper, if you will, above network operations in the consideration of obligations?