I am looking for some overall clarification on a few things I see in here that seem to be at odds with each other.
I want to start with the creation of the bill, which was meant to drive commercial negotiations, from my understanding, and to be a backstop for that. Really what we're trying to do is drive both parties, the shippers and the rail companies, to commercial negotiations. This arbitration process is hopefully something that is not made use of, or, if it is, very rarely made use of.
Do I have that intent correct?