Because the agency currently administers the act, and with the current obligation on railways to provide adequate and suitable accommodation for the receiving, loading, and unloading, using those terms that are currently in the act, the agency has experience in determining what service obligations would apply case by case when a shipper complains under the current Canada Transportation Act.
There is that knowledge of what different service obligations may be in a particular case, established through all those cases done over the years. It would be the expectation that when a shipper comes forward for arbitration, the knowledge of what the specific service obligation should be in a case will be very much in line with earlier decisions of the agency. Based on the vast gamut of things that you outlined here, if they apply in a particular case, it would be expected that the arbitrator would be able to impose any of those obligations.