Thank you, Mr. Chair.
If we have just rejected amendment 1 because of the fact that the general title is the best legal protection, the best way to avoid restricting the work, I imagine that, logically, we should accept amendment 2.
Actually, the term “operational terms”, which occurs in this bill, needlessly restricts the elements that form part of an agreement about levels of service. In my opinion, if we follow the same reasoning, we should give the agency or the arbitrator more latitude by using the word “terms” rather than the phrase “operational terms”. The latter seems clearly to restrict the jurisdiction.