We might have a chance to ask a question along the line of the P3 questioning, but it brings up the question as it relates to infrastructure. During this struggle with our fragile economic times, we tried to avoid a depression by making some significant investments in infrastructure. One of the things we did during that time was a regulatory change from the standpoint of environmental assessments. We said in terms of doing an environmental assessment that rather than having two, in cases where the regulation said you needed to have two assessments—federal and provincial—because of the jurisdictional issues, we would have enough confidence in the provinces to be able to do their own and we would accept that.
Did you take a position on that? Did you agree? I'm trying to get a sense of your position on that. Or do you feel that the two assessments versus one was the better approach? Did you have a preference for an approach?