Absolutely, and I would agree.
Coming back to our question, that efficiency comes back to actually bringing that dollar further, right? I mean, the faster we can get to a project, the less delays we have in getting to the project.... Everybody would agree with you also that the assessment and the protection of the environment on the project is paramount. There should be no shortcuts on that. However, the question becomes, is one process enough, or do we have to go through two or three processes in order to see that there is protection? That's really the crux of the matter.
I just wanted to go to P3 projects. There have been some questions about the P3 projects.
I've seen some extremely successful projects, actually, through the P3 process that have worked very well. I can speak of one in the city of Winnipeg, where a roadway was done. It was done under budget and it was done nine months ahead of schedule, and the quality of the work.... Everybody praises this roadway in Winnipeg. It's probably the best built roadway we have in the city, and it's been there for about two years now. Because the P3 proponent is actually also responsible for the maintenance, they have built this road to standards that probably are above and beyond what we would have, say, as our conventional normal standard.
Can you share any projects through the Union of Quebec Municipalities that have been done in the same way, where a project has come in on time, or ahead of time, and on budget, and with the ability to also have the costing of that maintenance actually lowered over the course of time?