Through the chair, this is an excellent question and an excellent point.
I am neither ideologically for or against P3s. I'm a pragmatist. If I think they are a better tool in a certain situation to spread costs, or whatever the reasons may be, I'm quite happy to see the government funding those. Again, I come back to the issue that the government is also the regulator. Somebody has to regulate these deals. In the Lansdowne case there was no value-for-money audit done.