In a sense, that's difficult to say without knowing exactly what's in place. It's a case of saying, does this activity add to the oversight, the due diligence, the accountability? If it doesn't, then why not consider taking it out?
As I mentioned, I think there are ways we tend to get caught, particularly with the P3s, by saying that if they are made more or less transparent then we will get a quicker process. So it tends to become more of a backroom type of operation.
I don't think that's always the case. Again, one only needs to look...and this is what the Asian investment bank predicted in their report. The public will become suspicious. There's a lack of trust and opposition to P3s, as we saw with Lansdowne, which ultimately slowed it down.
In terms of the steps—