Mr. Stoney, you talked about inappropriate transit choices, or inefficient transit decisions I think were the words you used. We've seen some of that when our city of Toronto went back and forth over whether or not to build the subway, some of it driven by provincial politicians, some by municipal politicians, but we've also had federal politicians put their oars in the water.
My counterpart on the other side talked about the Canada Line. As I remember the story, the Canada Line has just recently been found guilty of not paying their workers enough when they had Costa Rican and Ecuadorian workers in Canada being paid $3.57 an hour to build the Canada Line. On this side of the House, we don't want a P3 that is finally paying its workers the right amount of money 11 years later, and only those they could find. They were temporary foreign workers and they're back in their countries. It's only through the actions of one of the unions out there that they managed to get a multimillion-dollar settlement for these individuals.
We're concerned that P3 is a euphemism for cheap labour, and we're not in favour of reducing the Canadian standard of living by using cheap labour. Is that what P3s really mean?
That question is for either of you.