No. I wouldn't be principally against that. I don't know anything about it.
We canvassed one bridge story from Winnipeg. It was much smaller. It was a beautifully built bridge. It was not an issue of CUPE jobs or anything. But when we finally got our hands on the information four years after the bridge was built, the City of Winnipeg was paying about twice as much as they could have paid by building it through tendering with the city financing it. The city could borrow at half the rate of the private sector.
The devil will be in the details for the Windsor crossing, but I wouldn't enter that debate. I'd just say let's not borrow more expensively than we need to.