I'm a bit confused here, because what you're advocating is really freedom of choice. You're not advocating that non-unionized workers should take preference over the unionized workers.
What you're saying is that the taxpayer, of whom there is only one, should get the best return on his or her investment, meaning on the payment of their taxes. For a return on their investment, which we're all interested in—Mr. Coderre, indeed, said earlier that he cared very deeply about his wallet—does it not make sense that a government would invest the hard-earned money that taxpayers pay to the government every April 30, and every day through the HST and a variety of other taxes, to the benefit the people of the country, more than that of a very small minority, i.e., through the requirement to use unionized labour?
Again, I'm simply trying to figure out here basic common sense. Is that not—