That's a very good question. I would point to the example of the City of Hamilton.
Before the City of Hamilton, in 2005, became signatory to the carpenters union, many of our signatory contractors and our members performed work in the city of Hamilton. The City of Hamilton, prior to 2005, had a fair wage policy. Our contractors abided by that and our members were paid under that policy. You're very correct in pointing out that this is not necessarily a wage or compensation issue. Speaking to the economic side of the issue, it's a lack of competition that creates those cost overruns. When you shrink the pool of bidders by over 90%, you lose the ability to possibly get a lower number on who can do a particular job. That's the economic side of it.
The fairness side of the issue, from our perspective, is that our members have freely chosen to join our union and work for contractors who are signatory to our union. By doing so, they find themselves on the outside looking in in places like Hamilton, Toronto, and Waterloo, because they are not able to work on certain projects because their contractor is not able to bid on them.