On the principle, we want open and free competition without restrictions. On the fine point of how you get there and how you would use infrastructure agreements to do that is where we introduce this caveat: be sure what you're doing in those circumstances. The City of Hamilton may be a perfect example. It's not by choice that the City of Hamilton finds itself in that situation.
Is the appropriate remedy there to cut off federal funding? That's the second question.
I think that's where your question was going, and that's why I answered it that way.