Thank you for the question.
To clarify, on a cost overrun on a three-way, cost-shared project through the building Canada fund, for example, 100% of the cost overrun will be borne by the municipal government. Even if the cost overrun is a result of delays in approving the project—so between when an application is submitted, with a cost estimate of the project's cost, and when the project is approved—sometimes those delays can be two or three years. Of course, over that time construction costs increase because of inflation and the rest. One hundred per cent of those cost overruns are borne by the municipality. So for cost-shared programs like the building Canada fund, there's a tremendous amount of accountability on the municipality to stick to the budget required because they're not going to get a dollar more from the federal or provincial government than was promised originally. In that regard, there's really not a lot of room or a need for restrictions around that because the cost overruns are borne by the municipal government.
Of course, if the project comes in under budget, the federal contribution is in fact scaled back. It's kind of a ratchet effect. If the costs go up, it's a municipal responsibility. If the costs go down, the savings are shared among all three partners.
I hope that answers your question.