Those are balanced comments, and I appreciate the way you said it. I think what I've heard clearly from the two of you is that ultimately this is about an issue of fairness. I'm not sure why anyone on either side of this table would disagree, whether we have a pro-labour or non-pro-labour stance. I think we'll all pro-labour. I can't imagine that we're anti-organized labour or anti-non-organized labour. Purely from a fairness standpoint and even in relation to the taxpayer, I don't know how anyone around this table could disagree with that intent.
The tenor of your comments earlier were interesting, Mr. McDonald, but I think the way you've summarized that is very helpful.
Mr. Harris, your focus is obviously on Ontario. I have some interest in this. I'm from the 10th largest city in Canada, London, which is very close to your region of three cities, I understand. But it strikes me that what's happened in Hamilton, and your concern of the impact that it would have....
You're here in front of a federal committee reviewing this issue. What recommendation would you have for us? I appreciate you're dealing with your own bill, but I haven't heard a specific recommendation that you might offer to this committee as to what we might consider going forward as we review our own testimony. Could you comment on that?