Okay. So for Canadians who are hearing it, I just wanted to debunk any possible misinterpretation of it actually having any other implication than a slogan.
I want to go back to a question my colleague from the NDP raised on the economic damages to the tourism and fisheries industries and to private property, but I want to turn now and talk about, and ask you about, for a lot of Canadians, ecological damage.
What do these amendments do with respect to ecological damage?