It's very similar to the system that exists right now for oil pollution. Environmental damages are covered under this regime insofar as it involves restoration that is actually undertaken. That would also include the need to do any post-spill studies, as we call them, to determine whether or not restoration activities need to be undertaken to restore the environment quicker.
In terms of the principles around the regime, there is a legal framework around this that means there has to be a direct link between the actual losses, the costs, and the actual incident. You have to be able to prove that you've suffered a loss or you've undertaken a cost that is directly linked to the actual incident, to the pollution.