Okay, but the point is that one of the things they say in their executive summary is that the taxpayer shouldn't be on the hook for pollution caused by transportation of noxious substances or of oil. We “should not bear any liability for spills in Canadian waters”.
You've admitted that greater than $185 million or $400 million, I'm not exactly sure which, would in effect be borne by Canadian taxpayers, whether it's through the government itself—the provincial, municipal, or the federal government—having to pay for a cleanup like the one going on in Lac-Mégantic now, or through individuals, with Canadian taxpayers paying themselves for damages that are beyond damages covered by the liability limits of $400 million.
Why would this recommendation from the expert panel not be a good thing?