Clauses 65 and 67 of the bill talk about eliminating the provisions respecting pollution prevention officers, while retaining provisions concerning pollution response officers. Would you explain? Are the duties being combined, and if so, why?
Robert Chisholm NDP Dartmouth—Cole Harbour, NS
Clauses 65 and 67 of the bill talk about eliminating the provisions respecting pollution prevention officers, while retaining provisions concerning pollution response officers. Would you explain? Are the duties being combined, and if so, why?
See context to find out what was said next.