Yes, I'll make it quickly.
The idea behind this is just to make sure the taxpayers don't have to pay. Right now what we're saying is that the taxpayers would pay for the cleanup, rather than the oil companies.
It wouldn't be initiating a fund; it's a fund that already existed. It was stopped in 1973, in terms of how much money was put in. If we want to be fair, I think we should change the law, and it's Canadian law, to make sure that all HNS transporters contribute to that fund. Then we would have a fund that would make sure that Canadian taxpayers wouldn't have to pay.
It's really hard for me to understand why the government wants to protect the oil companies rather than the Canadian taxpayers. There's a fund that already existed. It was paid up until 1973. No additional money has been put in. Right now we're saying, “Well, no, let's not use that fund,” instead of, if we want to be fair, asking the transporters to put more money into the fund. That would be better. But to say that because the maximum cleanup cost $60 million it means that we won't have more, that's not prudent, in my mind.