The only thing that I think there is some reticence about is if there's information in there that also might compromise an ally or something of that nature, or if there's information in it that would be proprietary in nature. In order to understand what had actually occurred, we may have to discuss proprietary information, and that also might require some editing, or not publishing those sections of the report.
We haven't really had to do this yet, but when we're looking forward at the possibility of that occurring, we have considered all of these things, so as we prepare a report and pass it to the minister, one of the things that we always bear in mind is those issues. At this point we haven't had to amend a report, as we publish them publicly on the website through our administrative process, but we certainly wouldn't want to be statutorily obligated to make a report that we've made to the minister word for word available in a published format.