That's a great question, because there is another set of discussions happening.
We have published in the Gazette the standards we believe they should be built to. It's something the industry has been abiding by since 2011. There are a good number of improved DOT-111s already on the rails or being purchased. We wanted to ensure that we embedded the new standards in regulation, and that's what we're doing.
There's another discussion happening in the United States. That has to do with, beyond this new regulatory aspect, what a new DOT-111 car would look like. Those discussions are happening within the systems down there. We're monitoring those. We're a part of them, and the railways in Canada are a part of them as well. The goal of everybody is to ensure that we move dangerous goods, crude oil or whatever is inside them, as safely as possible. That's something that all industry can do.
Two weeks ago, Irving Oil made the decision that they would not accept cars that were not up to the new standard that we just published in regulations. That was a business decision they made. I commend them for it, because they are doing something without having to be forced to do it by regulation.
I would expect that other industries, companies, and shippers will be taking a look at the DOT-111 cars and the recommendations that have been made over the years and would come to the same conclusion, while we continue to do what we're doing on our side to make sure that we have that regulatory or policy oversight moving as quickly as we can and given the conditions we have with respect to the United States. There are a number of conversations taking place. Both sides of the border and Transport are seized with this issue. It's a very important issue. It's important that we get it correct, that we can work together, and that we do so without having a detrimental impact upon our supply chain and our prosperity.