I am going to answer the questions about the Auditor General's report in English, and afterwards, I am going to ask the CN representatives to reply to the question that concerned them.
I'm going to answer the Auditor General question, and then CN can answer the question for their company.
I just wanted to make the following point. The Auditor General's recommendation that struck me was that there wasn't a sufficient number of audits of SMS as part of their regime.
At the same time, there have been a significant number of inspections by Transport Canada, some 30,000 last year. In the wake of the tragedy at Lac-Mégantic, we found that there was a clamouring by critics and others for more inspections and more punishment, which are heading in precisely the opposite direction from relying on the safety management systems and an audit of the safety management systems which is seen.... Again, the Railway Safety Act was passed just two years ago with unanimous consent.
We have the system that we do and the construct of using safety management systems because it is accepted worldwide as being the most effective way you can manage safety within complex organizations like railways.
Unfortunately what we often get is a knee-jerk reaction that we need to inspect more and we need more regulation, but in fact, it is the safety management system that is—