I just wanted to clarify that our comments are directed only to federally regulated railways. We're not speaking to provincially regulated railways like in your province.
Further to the comment just now on the certificate of fitness, that language is something that we've really grappled with after Mégantic, trying to make this connection between changes in dangerous goods movements and the fitness of the railway. We really understand the day-to-day operations. The fitness is about the economics of getting that insurance certificate, self-insuring, being able to pay that out, and the safety functions with Transport, which is why we're looking to Transport to develop a comprehensive regime for catastrophic incidents involving Bakken or another dangerous good.