That’s fair enough.
On the FCM proposal and on the CTA description, what strikes me is that all of this, whether we're going to move to a two-tier regime, whether the CTA is going to strengthen liability coverage—all of these proposals, all of this good work presupposes that Transport Canada is doing its job. Is that not right? This is a study about rail safety and safety management systems. We were clear in the CTA testimony that CTA is not responsible for rail safety. That's a Transport Canada matter, right? FCM's not responsible, nor municipalities, for railway safety or SMS.
Doesn't all your good work, your mandated work at CTA, which is defined by the statute under which you operate, and the proposal from FCM—doesn't that all presuppose that there is a proper functioning of Transport Canada's job as a regulator and as an enforcer of standards? Isn't that the floor on which you're all building?