I look forward to the ongoing relationship for continuous improvement of our safety regime.
On to the question of liability, you've made some comparisons with respect to the marine sector in terms of how you would like to see the liability regime look for rail.
Once we ratify Bill C-3 for hazardous and noxious substances the marine sector will have access to an international fund, one will be created that way.
Under crude oil they have access to an international fund, and in addition, a domestic fund, the ship-source oil pollution fund.
Rail, though, is not a globalized mode of transport in the same way, so when you're making a comparison to marine I presume it's to the ship-source oil pollution fund and not access to an international fund. Is that fair to clarify FCM's position?