I would like to get back to Mr. Sullivan's line of questioning, with regard to the train tracks being moved closer to development. That may happen the rare time. Essentially, I think we all know and will acknowledge that the reality of what's happening is development is moving toward the train tracks; it's not happening the other way around for the most part.
I was hoping you would actually build a table with the committee, through the Chair, of the exact wording of the proposals you've been bringing forward to members of the FCM as to setbacks and urban planning, because it's more than only setbacks, it's also urban planning. It's not building a high school on one side and allowing them to put a Tim Hortons on the other side of a railway track. These are things that are happening and they need to be looked at.
At what point do municipalities take on a liability if they're not following some kind of reasonable structure in this urban planning?