May I address the member's questions? I think they're relevant questions.
The question does presume that, from the perspective and the experience of the operator, there is a problem with regard to the oversight. I can't speak to the motivations or characterizations in the survey. All I can speak to is fact and the experience we have as operators.
Frankly, I mentioned passion at the beginning, in this realm, in safety, and it is frustrating for us to hear the characterizations that somehow Transport Canada has dissolved into the wind over this transition, whereas the reality, ironically, is quite the opposite. We still see Transport Canada inspectors on a regular basis with much of what you consider the traditional surveillance activities, be they check-rides or visiting our dispatch centres.
What has been added on top of—not instead of, but on top of—that activity is an interaction with us that requires us to peel back the layers of our organization and demonstrate to Transport Canada, with respect to non-compliance, for example, exactly what causal factors were there, how we discovered the issues, and how we're mitigating them, to demonstrate to the regulator that we understand why something may have happened, how we're ensuring that it doesn't happen again, and in fact even proving the effectiveness of our solutions. This is all on top of traditional surveillance activity.
I just want to be clear. We can only speak to the facts and the experience that we have as operators, and we have a deeper and more meaningful oversight experience with Transport Canada than we have in the past.