I'd like to speak to the point of order, because the consent of the committee—at least from this side—was that the Auditor General would appear to respond to the work plan developed by Transport Canada. That was our consent in suggesting that the Auditor General appear, not simply to appear in regard to a report for which he's already appeared before this committee. That's a waste of our time. So if Mr. McGuinty wants to raise the consent of the committee, our consent was given contingent—and you can check the blues on that—to his appearing to respond to Transport Canada's updated action and work plan in relation to his report, not in relation to his own findings in the 2013 report. I would therefore suggest the Chair has actually fulfilled the consent of the committee.
On June 10th, 2014. See this statement in context.