Yes, from FCM's perspective, as I mentioned before, I think the key trend, both with this bill and Bill C-52, is the expansion of the scope in which the minister and inspectors can act when there's a threat. We know the development of the grade crossing regulations dealing with walk-crossing issues is prescribed right now for immediate threats. That's very narrow, so “significant threat” in this bill and then even the broader interpretation in Bill C-52 are welcome.
On March 26th, 2015. See this statement in context.