The only case in which you would have a pure railway company owning its crossing would be on its own property, in which case of course it would look after it.
Generally speaking, as I mentioned—and obviously we recognize that there is a need to cross railway tracks—from a safety standpoint we would like fewer of them. I happened to be at an international rail safety conference a couple of years ago, and the Government of India was presenting. They have a very aggressive plan to grow their rail network, and their objective is zero new crossings. The reason for that is safety.