Thank you.
In subclause 17(1), we repeal the definition of “fatigue science”. The definition states that it “means a scientifically based, data-driven and systematic method used to measure and manage human fatigue”. According to the notes we had regarding the briefing for this bill, it was actually repealed because there was something limiting about the definition, or it was limiting during the development of the new SMS. Can you explain why was it limiting? Also, why not use science?