The language you allude to is language that is in the Transportation of Dangerous Goods Act. That's the construct of that legislation. We're working with different legislation.
Under this legislation, notions are defined differently. If we go to the section in the act that defines what “operation” means, for example, the notion of operation in the act means an operational physical sense. The way this section is construed, it's construed in line with the language that is currently used in the statute as a whole. What this section says is basically that while a railway company is physically operating its railway, if its physical operation gets involved in an accident, then they're liable.
It's not unusual. We're working with the language of that statute, and the language in this section is completely consistent with the language of the statute.