Okay.
May I go to the third theme, which is sustainable development.
Ms. Dedman, you raised the important question of the federal government playing a role in this regard. I just want to remind you, and if I could, get a reaction from you, that it's rather hard to prevail upon a government to do something on sustainability when it eliminates the eco-energy program and thus eliminates a whole new economic sector in Canada, eliminates the commercial building retrofit program, eliminates the wind power production incentive, eliminates the renewable power production incentive. It won't even take its lead from the U.K. Conservative government, which brings in a whole new green deal that actually goes as far as compelling British homeowners to put a GHG rating on their home, which has a profound influence on the property markets and property values. The higher the GHG efficiency in the home, the higher the price of a home is now in the U.K., because they've actually incented a private sector approach to property ownership and to becoming more efficient.
Would you see the holus-bolus adoption of the American Envision program? They get it. They've just done it. Now you say that there are some Canadian projects looking to the U.S. Envision model. Should we be migrating it north? How do you see this?