I'll turn to P3s for a moment. We heard in our last meeting about the rise of P3s. I think it was Mr. McBride from PPP Canada Inc. who testified and said the rise of P3s has come as a result of some of the problems seen with traditional procurement, and he laid out some of the factors that P3s actually solve.
At a project level, I believe, Mr. Romoff, you suggested that not every project, and in fact a fairly low percentage overall, not insignificant but low, is actually worthy of the P3 model.
Can you run through some examples of projects that would be more suited to traditional procurement versus P3? I don't mean on a massive scale for P3. I want to get it down to the point where municipalities might meaningfully be looking at this and saying, “P3 or not P3? We're not sure”. Can you give us clarity on where you draw that dividing line?