No, I don't. As I said earlier, looking at that as one of the alternative procurement models is a fair request from the federal or provincial government, and it's one that should be examined during the process. It's one that should receive a fair consideration, but it is not the only alternative that should be presented in order to gain funding from the federal government. We have a similar situation here in B.C., with Partnerships B.C. being the organization that we're required to go through. Having gone through the Canada Line P3, and having been one of the involved members of TransLink throughout that process, I found it to be one of the most frustrating and disappointing times in my career. All of the information was kept secret from the public. We were not allowed to even go to our staff to get support in our opinions. Much of the advice we were receiving was from outside consultants who had often a vested interest in the project proceeding. It was very problematic.
While there are places where a P3 partnership can be a huge advantage to the public and to the private sector, there are other places where it isn't a valid consideration. Recently we went through exactly that process with the Lions Gate treatment plant. At the end of the process, KPMG, which was investigating and examining on behalf of this, through Partnerships B.C., agreed that this wasn't a good project for a P3. But we end up in a situation where the funding that's available is only going to go to P3 projects, so our project is down at the bottom of the list.