That's very interesting.
Measuring the infrastructure deficit has been alluded to several times. We've had the FCM and many others in to try to help us get a handle on how you measure infrastructure deficit at any given point in time. Presumably, assets have to be replaced on an ongoing basis across the country, so I don't know that we'll ever get rid of an infrastructure deficit, if you will.
Is that an accurate way to measure the particular problem? Do you measure infrastructure deficit in Burnaby, for example, and if so, what is it and how do you measure your progress against that?