I would echo a lot of what Mr. Toderian said. I think the role of the federal government is to support the priorities of our regions but also to have criteria to make sure that the projects that are being invested in are delivering a return on investment, at the very minimum a cost-benefit study of what the outcomes are or are likely to be, and the benefit of that project. I would probably frame it even more broadly in terms of a regional plan so that local governments were encouraged to at least develop regional plans at the outset and then the federal government would fund projects at the top of that list.
I would also encourage the funding not to be tied to a project delivery model. There are going to be cases where one model is effective. There are going to be other cases where it's not effective, and I think we have to leave that quite open-ended. I think it incurs risk when municipalities are told they can get money if they use this procurement model. The risks might not be allocated and they might be paying far higher prices than they have to, in certain circumstances.