I would first ask, who's evaluating the successful applications, and on what basis? I think when organizations are specifically focused on P3s, their lens is to look for projects that suit the P3 model. That can also encourage those who are doing the applications to try to tailor their projects to P3s. I think the group that's evaluating has to be independent from having a mandate to promote P3s.
In terms of other models, there are a variety of different approaches to delivering infrastructure. As I mentioned, construction management at risk is one that's gaining in popularity. That's more of an alliance type of contracting that starts early on in the process. That would be one. There are alliance types of contracting. There is design-build, which doesn't technically fall under private-public partnership but encourages the private sector to collaborate earlier on in terms of construction and design. That comes together much earlier on.
The key is to pick the right model for the right project. Then I think it's to have a group to evaluate these projects that's independent of one approach, whether it be traditional or public-private partnerships, to make both the studies and the adjudication on which one we should go with.