On page 23 you have a header that reads, “Too few audits were planned for assessing federal railways' safety management systems”. It seems to be a statement that their plan was inadequate, and yet you've said many times over the course of the testimony today that you weren't assessing whether their plan was adequate or not, that they had just not met their plan.
I'm wondering if you stand by this statement or whether you want to add some clarification to it, because it does seem contrary to the evidence I've been hearing today.