If I can just touch back to the beginning of the question, Mr. Chair, one of the responses the minister made to the interim recommendations on the terrible events at Lac-Mégantic included the issue of risk assessments. One of the things that was produced was an emergency directive and a ministerial order that responded to that recommendation. It directed those railways that were carrying any substantial amount of crude oil to carry out a risk assessment of their particular routes. There was a list of 28, or so, factors that were to be included in the analysis of their risks in their transportation of these dangerous goods.
One of the things we have done, as that process continued and as that information was incorporated into their plans, which has already been done.... The Transport Canada role has been to review those risk assessments, to look at what lessons were learned, whether they were similar across different companies, and what kinds of lessons could come from that process to more broadly look at the risk management of the network and the oversight system. They are not directly related to providing oversight input. We have a separate system that includes other processes for establishing the annual risk-based inspection plan that we develop each year. The two are linked, but they are not directly linked in terms of driving our oversight process.