That's fine. Thank you.
In response to my question during the debate, I questioned the Emerson report and the ways that Air Canada could be supported that wouldn't affect jobs in Canada during the bill's second reading. The parliamentary secretary to the Minister of International Trade said, “We did not accept every suggestion. We picked the ones we thought were the best”.
I'm wondering what other options were considered before you decided this was the best one. Do the parliamentary secretary's comments mean that this exercise of consulting over and over on the Emerson report is a sham and that you've actually made up your mind on which recommendations you're going to support and which ones you're not?