I can't speak to the examples you gave, but what I can speak to is the fact that it is not a partnership through the life of the asset. A lot of the private investors are unwilling to take the risk involved in getting the asset up to speed in generating revenues, and that's where the analysis and the risk diffusion can take place.
The intent is about getting more dollars invested in Canadian infrastructure for Canadians. We would set the conditions whereby we can attract that capital by diffusing the risk at certain instances. It's not, then, about side by side so much as looking at the risks involved in getting a particular infrastructure project up to speed and how we can facilitate that capital coming in. I would say the intent is to get more dollars of infrastructure working for the taxpayers.